Friday, July 21, 2006

25/55 OR LIFE




Although Mr. Manson is not on the pension committee, with Pataki's veto, he may see the outside before most veteran NYC teachers.

Governor Pataki vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have allowed teachers and all other non-uniformed public employees with 25 years of service to retire at age 55. Both houses of the Legislature overwhelmingly passed the bill; the Assembly by 138-6 and the Senate by 61-0.

UFT President Randi Weingarten issued the following statement:

”We are disappointed the governor vetoed this important legislation. We also think it is very interesting he would find 55/25 okay when connected to a bill on charter schools, but not by itself. Recruiting and retaining great teachers is the number one issue in education today. Research shows that teachers’ careers generally span 25 years, and creating an incentive that recognizes that would be a wonderful way to keep quality teachers.”

"We continue to try to get 55/25 legislation and have been working on two fronts to make that happen.

"We worked with entire public sector labor movement to get both houses to pass the legislation that, unfortunately, the governor chose to veto.

"We also working through the contract-created pension committee, in which the city obligated itself to jointly support 55/25 as long as it is cost-neutral.

"Even before the nationwide assault on pensions, as typified by the MTA's stance that spurred the transit strike, we always knew any new pension benefit would be an uphill battle unless the mayor was in agreement. The pension committee, which I chair, is still working, and the city and our union are making good progress on 55/25 legislation we both can support."

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Both houses of the Legislature overwhelmingly passed the bill; the Assembly by 138-6 and the Senate by 61-0. "

IF there's such a majority it should be a snap to override the veto. If they don't or can't due to some procedure then my take is:

The entire thing is a pre-ordained sham concocted by the UFT/politicians who knew full well Pataki (the one-time UFT endorsed Pataki) was going to veto and allow them to pin the blame on him which would allow the UFT to get off the hook with the members.

And remember, this bill only had a 2-year window and was therefore designed to get rid of senior teachers, not offer a general 55/25 option for all.

7/21/2006 12:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't he on the negotiating committee?

7/22/2006 6:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, Norm is not.

7/24/2006 5:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No. Anon wasn't referring to me. He meant Pataki. UFT endorsement confers honorary membership on the negotiating committee.

And to quote a famous philosopher:
I don't want to be on any committee that would accept the likes of me.

7/24/2006 7:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is Manson of the negotiating committee?

7/25/2006 2:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unity would never Manson on the negotiating committee they already have a "Charlie".

7/27/2006 7:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With such overwhelming numbers, here is still a great possibility that the legislature will pass it. isn't there?

7/31/2006 11:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know wasn't one of Randi's and the DA's goals to get a coalition? Wasn't another goal to get the Taylor Law changed? Isn't the TAylor Law in the same place as 55/25 - almost there with an override?

7/31/2006 11:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Norm if you are all about "independent Chapter Leaders" then shouldn't the new chapter leaders NOT join ICE either? That would make them TRULY independent!

8/01/2006 12:03 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Site Meter