Wednesday, December 28, 2005

TWU Contract Fallout

Newsday: TWU board OKs contract deal

http://www.twulocal100.org/index.asp?Type=B_PR&SEC={B7B64A0A-A600-4129-B3D4-C03D985DC0A3}&DE={16B9FAB2-EC7D-46C0-BEA8-09FA55E2168F}

Two things of interest to teachers:
1. How does the new TWU contract compare to ours?
2. How much more did the union win by going on strike?

This is an Excel generated comparison of a worker for each union who makes $50K a year. Recall that teachers got a 6 month ZERO, 11 month 2%, 1 year 3.5%, 11 months of 5.5%, and 12.5 months of 3.25%. Note that to make an even comparison, only the first 37 months of the 52.5 month teacher contract is used (note, however, that if extended with even minute hypothetical increases in a following TWU contract, it would just make the TWU deal even better). The TWU got 12 months of 3%, 12 months of 4%, and 13 months of 3.5%.

SCROLL ALL THE WAY DOWN (SORRY!)









































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































TEACHERTWU WORKER
monthsalfactornewdifferencemonthsalfactornewdifference
1500001500000.001500001.0351500125.00
2500001500000.002500001.0351500125.00
3500001500000.003500001.0351500125.00
4500001500000.004500001.0351500125.00
5500001500000.005500001.0351500125.00
6500001500000.006500001.0351500125.00
7500001.025100083.337500001.0351500125.00
8500001.025100083.338500001.0351500125.00
9500001.025100083.339500001.0351500125.00
10500001.025100083.3310500001.0351500125.00
11500001.025100083.3311500001.0351500125.00
12500001.025100083.3312500001.0351500125.00
13500001.025100083.3313500001.071253560296.67
14500001.025100083.3314500001.071253560296.67
15500001.025100083.3315500001.071253560296.67
16500001.025100083.3316500001.071253560296.67
17500001.025100083.3317500001.071253560296.67
18500001.055752785232.0818500001.071253560296.67
19500001.055752785232.0819500001.071253560296.67
20500001.055752785232.0820500001.071253560296.67
21500001.055752785232.0821500001.071253560296.67
22500001.055752785232.0822500001.071253560296.67
23500001.055752785232.0823500001.071253560296.67
24500001.055752785232.0824500001.071253560296.67
25500001.055752785232.0825500001.10869255435452.88
26500001.055752785232.0826500001.10869255435452.88
27500001.055752785232.0827500001.10869255435452.88
28500001.055752785232.0828500001.10869255435452.88
29500001.055752785232.0829500001.10869255435452.88
30500001.11376455688474.0130500001.10869255435452.88
31500001.11376455688474.0131500001.10869255435452.88
32500001.11376455688474.0132500001.10869255435452.88
33500001.11376455688474.0133500001.10869255435452.88
34500001.11376455688474.0134500001.10869255435452.88
35500001.11376455688474.0135500001.10869255435452.88
36500001.11376455688474.0136500001.10869255435452.88
37500001.11376455688474.0137500001.10869255435452.88
7493.7810947.48

Right away, it should be clear that Joe Blow earns $3500 more over the life of the TWU contract. Now let's consider the givebacks:

The UFT gave back 2 (3 if you work in Brooklyn or Queens) days of work. (1.1% giveback (1.6%, B+Q))

The TWU earned 1 more holiday off (MLK Day)

The UFT gave back 10 minutes of time for the money (2.5% giveback)

The TWU made NO such time for money swap.

The UFT contract includes harsher disciplinary rules including loss of grievance rights, as well as the elimination of seniority rights (transfers).

The TWU (ONLY by striking) eliminated demands for conductorless trains and changing the Token Booth job description, as well as secured a truly independent (not state employed) arbiter to assess alleged excessive disciplinary actions.

For the UFT, higher deductibiles and co-pays incorporated as permanent.

For the TWU, a 1.5% salary deduction (giveback) for health insurance premiums. (This is clearly troubling)

The UFT sold out new and future teachers with a reduced (albeit not as draconian as the cops) salary schedule.

The TWU held the line on demands for a separate 62 year old retirement for new workers (ALL workers will still have 55 year old retirement - another item ONLY won by striking)

2: What the TWU won only by striking:

NO increase in retirement age (with full pension) from 55 to 62 for new workers.

NO increase in pension contribution from 2% to 6% for new workers.

NO increase in pension contribution from 2% to 3% for current workers.

A refund for 16,000 workers for the difference between the 5.2% pension contribution they paid before 2001 and the 2% now mandated. This is worth between $10K and $20K for many workers.

LIFETIME HEALTH CARE - this from a former transit worker: "TWU lost it [health care] when we retired from active until medicare picks us up at age 65. So if you retire at age 55 you hadn't any healthcare for 10 years unless your spouse or you had another insurance."

PAID MATERNITY LEAVE instead of mothers having to use their sick days.(NOTE: this was only called a "stipend" in the Daily News)

*This was paid for with a 0.5% concession on the health care (the MTA had demanded 1% prior to the deadline)

All in all: far from a slam dunk, as the union won no additional wage incrases from the strike, and the health insurance issue is a major problem for organized labor in the years to come. You can guarantee Bloomberg is going to ask us to pay for our insurance as well. However, it's clear that a militant union strategy paid off, with several key givebacks eliminated as well as the addition of a couple of benefits. Perhaps most important - NO extra work.

11 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

A militant approach to contract negotiations does
no one any good. To create division among union members actually weakens the union as a whole. It is obvious that the "members" of your so called "utp" are in reality anti-union activists and anti-democratic in your "ideology". You have replaced the fair and honest debate promoted by members of Unity with writings that have a political agenda that is both dangerous and offensive to the main stream body of teaching professionals. We don't need any self appointed "reformers" to question the direction set by our union leadership. Many of us feel that you represent the lowest element within our union and even though we have been warned about your "web site" I felt I had to view it for myself and I must admit I am both shocked and outraged by your condemnation of our own union.

12/31/2005 4:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Many of us feel that you represent the lowest element within our union and even though we have been warned about your "web site" "

Were you warned to not check out our "web site" because you would come on over to our side after realizing how foolish Unity has been?

1/01/2006 4:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The lowest element in our union are the people who unquestioningly do as they are told. Those who are too spineless to stand up for themselves, and would rather accept the status quo and be led like lambs to the slaughter actually weaken our union. People looking out for their own interests instead of the membership's best interest are the lowest of the low. Lackeys that want union related perks and jobs divide this union and keep us weak. I am shocked and outraged that someone could call any dissenting voices "anti-democratic"! Aren't the people like the last poster who want to shut up any opposition the ones who are anti-democratic? Don't we need reformers to work towards creating a stronger union, or at least act as watchdogs over our corrupt leadership?

1/03/2006 9:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now what do you say to the TWU truning it down?

1/22/2006 11:12 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This contract contained an escalator to pass along H&W cost increases above the inflation
rate to the workers, eliminating the need to negotiate increases in the worker contributions in the future. Further, workers earning higher gross salaries would be paying more than workers earning less, for the same coverage.
this was a bad deal, negotiated from a position of weakness. Fortunately, a simple majority
saw thru it, despite the carrot of back pension money waved before them. This deal would have cost the members dearly over the length of the contract and beyondJust based on the past three years, the cost of H&W contributions will more than likely exceed the pay increases. Darkhorse.

1/22/2006 11:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah but the "militant action" that "paid off" doesn't seem to have paid off. so now what do they do? You claim that TWU's strike created few if any concessions compared to the UFT but now where do they go with those few if any concessions and this militancy?

1/22/2006 12:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What can be learned so far from the TWU contract situation? There are two parts to this saga: one is concluded and the other is still being resolved.

First, for the sake of argument, forget that the contract was voted down last week. Was the strike threat a serious one? Yes. Did the three day strike improve the contract being negotiated between the union and the MTA? Yes, significantly.

Did the strike produce penalties? Yes. It was anticipated that each worker would be fined two days' pay for each day on strike. The decision by a state judge to fine the TWU
$3 million for contempt of court is a serious threat, quite heavy-handed, but one which is being vigorously fought in court, with the contention being that the fines were unconstitutional, as there had been no jury trial, as prescribed by the Sixth Amendment. Finally, it was reported in the NY Times that the most severe penalty, revocation of automatic dues collection via payroll deductions, is being considered by PERB. This crippling action is also being vigorously contested, and the Times article gave the impression that the TWU is in a good position on this issue. [See NY Times, Metro Section, 1/28/06.]

So we have to wait and see how the penalties play out in the coming days.

Part two of the saga began when the members narrowly voted down the contract. This has certainly changed the dynamics, and, again, we'll have to wait and see what happens.

But, back to my main argument: it seems that a real strike threat, and the actual occurrence of a strike, did produce an improved contract over the so-called, "final offer." There is always a "post-strike" battle thanks to the Taylor Law. But, sometimes, to maintain your self-respect and dignity, you have to take a few lumps.

1/30/2006 8:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nobody ever won a fight without throwing a punch. The TWU has established that their strike threats are credible, and must be taken seriously. They have established a precedent for future contract disputes, and laid a foundation upon which future contract settlements will be built. Meanwhile back at the UFT, not only have we accepted a contract that offers us no gains, and givebacks that have set us back decades -- but we have established a future precedent for contract negotiations. Our future contracts will be just as bad or worse than the one we just ratified. The UFT has no leverage in a contract battle, and we have proven to be unwilling to fight for a better deal. The powers that be understand that we will accept whatever contract is put in front of us, and have no reason to take any objections we raise seriously. Until we change this pattern and take a stand, our working conditions, and the teaching profession itself will continue to be eroded. We need the credible threat of a strike, or some other job action to use as a weapon in our future contract battles. Passively being crapped on has gotten un nowhere, and will continue to get us nowhere.

2/05/2006 11:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

theutp.blogspot.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoy reading theutp.blogspot.com every day.
payday loan bc
online payday loans

11/24/2009 5:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://ivlkrwnnz.com]gSqNfprHPxlL[/url] - wiFnstieSLXq , http://yuxeflk.com

12/12/2012 5:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

buy ativan lorazepam 1mg para que sirve - ativan highest dose

3/13/2013 7:03 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Site Meter